Subaru WRX S4
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Volkswagen Arteon
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Subaru WRX S4
Car A
Subaru WRX S4
The Subaru WRX S4 blends AWD traction and strong turbo performance with five-seat practicality, offering good value in its segment. It’s quick and 5-star safe, though 9.6 L/100 km fuel use may not suit economy-focused buyers.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safetyAWD
Volkswagen Arteon
Car B
Volkswagen Arteon
The Volkswagen Arteon blends strong petrol performance with real everyday usability for growing families and road trips. Front‑wheel drive and 8.5 L/100 km combined consumption make it less ideal for harsh winters or efficiency‑first buyers.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8.5 L/100km280 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 61 / 65
City 47 / 36
Budget / value 61 / 59
Road trip 57 / 64
Performance 38 / 33
Cargo 25 / 31
Practical 40 / 44
Premium 26 / 34
Winter 66 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Subaru WRX S4 · Orange = Volkswagen Arteon

Specs side-by-side

Spec Subaru WRX S4 Volkswagen Arteon
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Subaru WRX S4

  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.1 s with 275 hp and 400 Nm
  • AWD grip for confident year-round driving
  • 5-star safety rating
  • Room for five and a 460 L trunk suit growing families

Volkswagen Arteon

  • Strong performance for its class: 280 hp and 0–100 km/h in 5.6 s
  • Spacious 5-seat layout and 563 L trunk suit families and road trips
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 36,000
  • Positive safety ranking signal for peace of mind

Verdict

Pick Subaru WRX S4 if…
Lower entry price
Subaru WRX S4 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Volkswagen Arteon if…
More power
Volkswagen Arteon puts out 280 hp vs 275 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons