Skoda Kodiaq RS vs Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

Skoda Kodiaq RS

Suv · Diesel

Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

Suv · Gasoline · AWD

Car A

Skoda Kodiaq RS

The Skoda Kodiaq RS suits large families who want seven seats and a huge 835-liter trunk without giving up brisk performance. It’s efficient for its class and better suited to road trips than city shuttling.

7 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety8.3 L/100km

Car B

Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

The Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion pairs 7-seat practicality with AWD and a robust V6, making it well-suited to large families and road trips. Its size and 10.5 L/100 km consumption may deter city-focused or efficiency-first buyers.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety280 hpAWD

Why compared cross branddifferent powertrainsame body typesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 92 / 87

City 30 / 27

Budget / value 50 / 48

Road trip 71 / 75

Performance 27 / 39

Cargo 60 / 52

Practical 63 / 57

Premium 38 / 37

Winter 40 / 80

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq RS · Orange = Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq RS Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq RS

Seven seats and an 835-liter trunk make it easy for large families and luggage.
Strong passing power from 245 hp and 500 Nm with a 6.6 s 0–100.
Efficient for its class with a combined consumption of 8.3, good for long trips.
Safety ranks as a strength in its positioning, matching family priorities.
Less convenient for tight city use and short hops.
Not tuned for hardcore performance driving despite its badge.
Price of 55,000 may exceed some family-car budgets.
If you won’t use three rows or the big boot, a smaller model could fit better.

Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

Seven seats and a 700 L trunk suit large families and long trips
AWD 4Motion adds year-round confidence on wet or snowy roads
Strong V6 with 280 hp and 500 Nm delivers assured acceleration (0–100 km/h in 8.6 s)
$49,995 is good value in its segment for a 7-seat AWD V6
Seven-seat footprint is less convenient for tight city driving and parking
10.5 L/100 km combined may not meet efficiency-first priorities
Performance is capable but not sporty for enthusiasts (8.6 s to 100 km/h)
Not aimed at premium-focused buyers

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq RS if…

Best fuel economy

Skoda Kodiaq RS uses 8.3 L/100km vs 10.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion if…

All-wheel drive

Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq RS

Volkswagen Teramont 4Motion

Verdict

Related comparisons