Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG vs Volkswagen Teramont X — full comparison

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG

Suv · Gasoline

vs

Volkswagen Teramont X

Suv · Gasoline

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG

Car A

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG

A seven-seat petrol model that majors on space, practicality, and peace of mind for large families and road trips. It offers strong pace and good value in its segment, but it isn’t a premium or enthusiast pick.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8 L/100km

Volkswagen Teramont X

Car B

Volkswagen Teramont X

The Volkswagen Teramont X leans toward family utility and road-trip duty, with seven seats, a 585 L trunk, and strong power for highway overtakes. It suits large families seeking space and value, but city convenience and fuel economy are not its strengths.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety250 hp

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 89 / 83

City 34 / 30

Budget / value 62 / 56

Road trip 68 / 69

Performance 24 / 30

Cargo 53 / 45

Practical 63 / 55

Premium 32 / 33

Winter 40 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG · Orange = Volkswagen Teramont X

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG Volkswagen Teramont X

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG

Seats seven with a generous 720-liter cargo area for family duties
Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s for confident overtakes when fully loaded
Efficient for its class at 8 L/100 km for commuting and touring
Emphasis on reliability and safety within its class
Not positioned as a premium choice in materials or badge
Tuned more for comfort than engaging performance driving
Petrol economy may trail diesel or hybrid rivals in heavy city use
Large seven-seat format may be unnecessary if you rarely carry more than five

Volkswagen Teramont X

Seven seats and a 585 L trunk support large-family hauling and luggage.
250 hp and 500 Nm deliver confident passing and on-ramp merges (0-100 km/h in 8 s).
Road-trip friendly thanks to ample cargo space and easy highway pace.
Priced at 35000, offering good value in its segment for space and power.
Combined consumption of 10.5 L/100 km is not very efficient for daily commuting.
Seven-seat size can feel cumbersome in tight city streets and parking.
Not aimed at performance driving despite respectable acceleration.
Petrol-only powertrain with no electrified efficiency benefits.

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG if…

Best fuel economy

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI DSG uses 8.0 L/100km vs 10.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Volkswagen Teramont X if…

More power

Volkswagen Teramont X puts out 250 hp vs 190 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons