Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Teramont — full comparison

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI

Suv · Gasoline

vs

Volkswagen Teramont

Suv · Gasoline

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI

Car A

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI

A seven-seat petrol family car that prioritizes space and efficiency, the Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI balances a very large cargo area with sensible consumption. It suits large families and long trips more than premium or performance seekers.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety7.3 L/100km

Volkswagen Teramont

Car B

Volkswagen Teramont

A 7-seat family vehicle that blends strong power with usable space and efficiency for its class. It suits large families and road trips while offering good value in its segment.

7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety250 hp

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 92 / 80

City 36 / 33

Budget / value 63 / 60

Road trip 70 / 67

Performance 24 / 30

Cargo 60 / 41

Practical 65 / 55

Premium 31 / 32

Winter 40 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI · Orange = Volkswagen Teramont

Specs side-by-side

Spec Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI Volkswagen Teramont

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI

Seven seats and an 835-litre boot support large-family duties.
Efficient for its class with a 7.3 combined consumption figure.
Good value in its segment around 33,000.
Confident everyday performance (180 hp, 320 Nm, 0–100 in 6.9 s).
You want an electric or hybrid powertrain; it’s petrol-only.
You prioritize a premium-feel interior and brand image.
You’re seeking a performance-focused drive over family practicality.
Your budget is tighter than the circa-33,000 asking price.

Volkswagen Teramont

Seven seats and a usable 500-liter cargo area for family duty.
250 hp and 500 Nm deliver confident acceleration (0-100 km/h in 8 s).
Combined consumption of 9 L/100 km is efficient for its class.
Priced at 32,000, offering good value in its segment.
Not aimed at performance driving despite solid straight-line pace.
Not a premium-focused choice.
500 liters may be tight if you regularly haul bulky gear for seven.
No quoted electric-only range; not ideal if you want plug-in or zero-emission commuting.

Verdict

Pick Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI if…

Best fuel economy

Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI uses 7.3 L/100km vs 9.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Volkswagen Teramont if…

More power

Volkswagen Teramont puts out 250 hp vs 180 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons