Peugeot 208 GT Line
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Peugeot 208 GT Line
Car A
Peugeot 208 GT Line
The Peugeot 208 GT Line pairs efficient city driving with strong safety and good value in its segment. Its 130 hp setup is lively enough for everyday use while maintaining a 4.6 L/100 km combined figure.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety4.6 L/100km130 hp
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Car B
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
A compact, city-focused petrol model that balances efficiency and everyday usability with decent pace. Strong reliability and safety signals make it an easy fit for commuters and small families, but it’s not aimed at cargo-heavy or premium tastes.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 60 / 64
City 75 / 76
Budget / value 68 / 75
Road trip 29 / 29
Performance 30 / 29
Cargo 17 / 19
Practical 51 / 54
Premium 17 / 15
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Peugeot 208 GT Line · Orange = Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Peugeot 208 GT Line Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Peugeot 208 GT Line

  • Efficient for its class at 4.6 L/100 km combined.
  • Five-star safety rating for added peace of mind.
  • 130 hp, 230 Nm and 8.7 s 0–100 km/h make daily driving easy.
  • Practical for compact-family use with 5 seats and a 311 L trunk.

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100 km.
  • Responsive enough for city traffic (0–100 km/h in 9 s, 115 hp, 200 Nm).
  • Useful everyday space for a compact car (351 L trunk, five seats).
  • Good value in its segment around 21,000.

Verdict

Pick Peugeot 208 GT Line if…
Best fuel economy
Peugeot 208 GT Line uses 4.6 L/100km vs 5.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI if…
Performance & capability
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons