Nissan NV200 Van
Van · Gasoline
vs
Volkswagen Caddy V
Van · Gasoline
Nissan NV200 Van
Car A
Nissan NV200 Van
The Nissan NV200 Van focuses on low running costs and generous cargo space, making it good value in its segment. Performance is modest and the two-seat layout limits family use.
2 seatsVanGasoline4-star safety6 L/100km
Volkswagen Caddy V
Car B
Volkswagen Caddy V
A practical two-seat Caddy V that emphasizes cargo utility and efficiency for commuting and two-person road trips. Performance is steady rather than sporty, and overall it offers good value in its segment.
2 seatsVanGasoline5-star safety122 hp
Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 67 / 55
City 47 / 45
Budget / value 67 / 51
Road trip 49 / 46
Performance 28 / 28
Cargo 72 / 38
Practical 49 / 30
Premium 18 / 22
Winter 22 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Nissan NV200 Van · Orange = Volkswagen Caddy V

Specs side-by-side

Spec Nissan NV200 Van Volkswagen Caddy V
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Nissan NV200 Van

  • Efficient for its class (6 L/100 km) reduces operating costs
  • 4,000 L cargo capacity handles bulky loads
  • Priced at 23,100, it offers good value in its segment
  • Solid safety and reliability for daily work (4 stars, 75)

Volkswagen Caddy V

  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km, easing fuel costs on daily drives and longer trips
  • Two-seat layout with 610 L of cargo space suits gear-heavy errands and small-business use
  • Balanced everyday performance from 122 hp and 250 Nm (0–100 km/h in 10.5 s)
  • Price near 25,000 provides good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Nissan NV200 Van if…
Best fuel economy
Nissan NV200 Van uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Volkswagen Caddy V if…
More power
Volkswagen Caddy V puts out 122 hp vs 110 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons