Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200
Crossover · Gasoline
Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI
Car A
Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI
The Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI leans toward efficiency and everyday practicality, pairing a 445 L boot with low combined consumption for a compact family role. Performance is modest, but its safety ranking signal and price around 25000 make it a balanced city-and-family pick.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.8 L/100km
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200
Car B
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200
The Mercedes-Benz GLA 200 focuses on compact family practicality and efficient running, with five seats and a 435 L trunk. Its 163 hp performance suits city driving and commuting more than spirited runs.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety163 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profile

Usage fit

Family 69 / 68
City 57 / 54
Budget / value 67 / 63
Road trip 50 / 50
Performance 29 / 28
Cargo 31 / 31
Practical 52 / 52
Premium 22 / 45
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI · Orange = Mercedes-Benz GLA 200

Specs side-by-side

Spec Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI Mercedes-Benz GLA 200
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI

  • Efficient for its class, with a combined consumption of 5.8
  • Strong safety ranking signal within its segment
  • 445 L boot supports family errands and weekend trips
  • Price around 25000 represents good value in its segment

Mercedes-Benz GLA 200

  • Efficient for its class at 6.1 L/100 km
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a usable 435 L trunk
  • Balanced 163 hp and 8.7 s 0–100 km/h for daily driving
  • At a price of 35,000, it offers good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Volkswagen T-Roc 1.0 TSI uses 5.8 L/100km vs 6.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz GLA 200 if…
More power
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200 puts out 163 hp vs 115 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons