Volkswagen Passat NMS
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Mazda6 Sedan
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Volkswagen Passat NMS
Car A
Volkswagen Passat NMS
The Volkswagen Passat NMS delivers generous space, efficient petrol running, and solid performance at a price that reads as good value for growing families and road trips. Its focus leans more toward reliability and safety than luxury flair.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km220 hp
Mazda6 Sedan
Car B
Mazda6 Sedan
The Mazda6 Sedan offers good value in its segment with a blend of safety, reliability, and usable performance. It’s efficient for its class and family-friendly, though not targeted at premium shoppers.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profile

Usage fit

Family 67 / 64
City 42 / 53
Budget / value 69 / 70
Road trip 64 / 53
Performance 36 / 33
Cargo 32 / 26
Practical 49 / 47
Premium 30 / 23
Winter 30 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Volkswagen Passat NMS · Orange = Mazda6 Sedan

Specs side-by-side

Spec Volkswagen Passat NMS Mazda6 Sedan
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Volkswagen Passat NMS

  • Very large 586 L trunk supports family gear and long-weekend luggage.
  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km, helping control fuel spend.
  • Strong everyday performance: 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s with 220 hp and 350 Nm.
  • Good value in its segment around $26,000.

Mazda6 Sedan

  • Competitive $25,000 price for what it offers
  • Efficient for its class at 6.8 L/100 km
  • 5-star safety paired with a strong reliability score (85)
  • Practical layout: 5 seats and a 480 L trunk

Verdict

Pick Volkswagen Passat NMS if…
Best fuel economy
Volkswagen Passat NMS uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda6 Sedan if…
Reliability edge
Mazda6 Sedan scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons