Mazda CX-80
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Volkswagen Teramont X
Suv · Gasoline
Mazda CX-80
Car A
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 targets large families with seven seats, everyday practicality, and running costs that are efficient for its class. It balances space and performance while offering good value in its segment.
7 seatsSuvGasoline8.5 L/100km
Volkswagen Teramont X
Car B
Volkswagen Teramont X
The Volkswagen Teramont X leans toward family utility and road-trip duty, with seven seats, a 585 L trunk, and strong power for highway overtakes. It suits large families seeking space and value, but city convenience and fuel economy are not its strengths.
7 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety250 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 52 / 83
City 33 / 30
Budget / value 45 / 56
Road trip 42 / 69
Performance 27 / 30
Cargo 41 / 45
Practical 44 / 55
Premium 24 / 33
Winter 28 / 40

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-80 · Orange = Volkswagen Teramont X

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-80 Volkswagen Teramont X
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-80

  • Seven-seat flexibility suits large families
  • 510 L cargo space supports errands and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km
  • 200 hp and 7.5 s 0–100 km/h aid confident merging

Volkswagen Teramont X

  • Seven seats and a 585 L trunk support large-family hauling and luggage.
  • 250 hp and 500 Nm deliver confident passing and on-ramp merges (0-100 km/h in 8 s).
  • Road-trip friendly thanks to ample cargo space and easy highway pace.
  • Priced at 35000, offering good value in its segment for space and power.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-80 if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-80 uses 8.5 L/100km vs 10.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Volkswagen Teramont X if…
More power
Volkswagen Teramont X puts out 250 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons