Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2019
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI
Car A
Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI
The Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI prioritizes city-friendly efficiency with enough pace for daily driving, offering good value in its segment. Practical seating for five and a 351 L trunk support small-family and commuting needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Honda Fit 2019
Car B
Honda Fit 2019
With seating for 5, a 470-liter trunk, and 6.7 combined consumption, the 2019 Honda Fit is tuned for city driving and growing families. At 19990, it offers good value in its segment with an emphasis on reliability and safety over outright speed.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety130 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 62 / 68
City 76 / 73
Budget / value 72 / 73
Road trip 29 / 31
Performance 29 / 28
Cargo 19 / 26
Practical 52 / 55
Premium 14 / 15
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI · Orange = Honda Fit 2019

Specs side-by-side

Spec Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Honda Fit 2019
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100 km, ideal for city driving
  • Quick enough for confident merging (0–100 km/h in 9 s)
  • Usable 5-seat layout and 351 L trunk for everyday errands
  • Good value in its segment around the 21,000 price point

Honda Fit 2019

  • Good value in its segment at 19990
  • Efficient for its class with 6.7 combined consumption
  • Seats 5 with a 470-liter trunk for daily family needs
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety per rankings

Verdict

Pick Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI if…
Best fuel economy
Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI uses 5.0 L/100km vs 6.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2019 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2019 puts out 130 hp vs 105 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons