Honda Fit 2017
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2017
Car A
Honda Fit 2017
A practical 5‑seat FWD model with strong signals for reliability and safety, the Honda Fit 2017 suits budget‑focused city use. Decent everyday performance and a 470‑liter trunk add versatility for growing families.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety130 hp
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Car B
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
A compact, city-focused petrol model that balances efficiency and everyday usability with decent pace. Strong reliability and safety signals make it an easy fit for commuters and small families, but it’s not aimed at cargo-heavy or premium tastes.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 68 / 64
City 73 / 76
Budget / value 74 / 75
Road trip 31 / 29
Performance 30 / 29
Cargo 26 / 19
Practical 55 / 54
Premium 14 / 15
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2017 · Orange = Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2017 Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2017

  • Good value in its segment at a price of 15,990
  • 470‑liter trunk and five seats support city errands and small‑family duty
  • Efficient for its class with 7.1 combined consumption
  • Easy to drive in town with FWD, 130 hp, and a 9.6 s 0–100

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100 km.
  • Responsive enough for city traffic (0–100 km/h in 9 s, 115 hp, 200 Nm).
  • Useful everyday space for a compact car (351 L trunk, five seats).
  • Good value in its segment around 21,000.

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2017 if…
Lower entry price
Honda Fit 2017 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI if…
Performance & capability
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons