Honda Fit 2013
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2013
Car A
Honda Fit 2013
A city-focused 5-seat FWD model that pairs a roomy 470 L trunk with efficient 5.8 L/100 km running. With reliability and safety as priorities and a 16,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety132 hp
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Car B
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
A compact, city-focused petrol model that balances efficiency and everyday usability with decent pace. Strong reliability and safety signals make it an easy fit for commuters and small families, but it’s not aimed at cargo-heavy or premium tastes.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 67 / 64
City 75 / 76
Budget / value 74 / 75
Road trip 31 / 29
Performance 30 / 29
Cargo 26 / 19
Practical 55 / 54
Premium 14 / 15
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2013 · Orange = Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2013 Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2013

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km for daily commuting
  • 470 L trunk and five seats handle everyday family tasks
  • Reliability and safety rank as key strengths
  • At 16,000, it represents good value in its segment

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100 km.
  • Responsive enough for city traffic (0–100 km/h in 9 s, 115 hp, 200 Nm).
  • Useful everyday space for a compact car (351 L trunk, five seats).
  • Good value in its segment around 21,000.

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2013 if…
Lower entry price
Honda Fit 2013 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI if…
Reliability edge
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons