Honda Fit 2012
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2012
Car A
Honda Fit 2012
A compact, city-focused 5-seater that prioritizes reliability and efficiency, with generous cargo space for its size. Best for budget-minded commuters and small families rather than performance seekers.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety117 hp
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Car B
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
A compact, city-focused petrol model that balances efficiency and everyday usability with decent pace. Strong reliability and safety signals make it an easy fit for commuters and small families, but it’s not aimed at cargo-heavy or premium tastes.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km
Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 67 / 64
City 74 / 76
Budget / value 74 / 75
Road trip 30 / 29
Performance 30 / 29
Cargo 24 / 19
Practical 54 / 54
Premium 13 / 15
Winter 20 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2012 · Orange = Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2012 Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2012

  • Efficient for its class at 6.7 L/100 km, strong fit for city commuting
  • Strong reliability and safety signals
  • Roomy 437 L cargo area for a compact 5-seater
  • At 15,990, it offers good value in its segment

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

  • Efficient for its class at 5 L/100 km.
  • Responsive enough for city traffic (0–100 km/h in 9 s, 115 hp, 200 Nm).
  • Useful everyday space for a compact car (351 L trunk, five seats).
  • Good value in its segment around 21,000.

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2012 if…
Lower entry price
Honda Fit 2012 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI if…
Performance & capability
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons