Volkswagen Caddy II
Van · Gasoline
vs
Ford Transit Connect Van
Van · Gasoline
Volkswagen Caddy II
Car A
Volkswagen Caddy II
The two-seat Volkswagen Caddy II favors cargo room and straightforward running costs over family versatility or speed. It’s good value in its segment for buyers who need simple transport for two with space for gear.
2 seatsVanGasoline4-star safety7.5 L/100km
Ford Transit Connect Van
Car B
Ford Transit Connect Van
A two-seat gasoline van focused on cargo, the Ford Transit Connect Van combines a 2500-liter load area with efficient 8.5 L/100 km consumption. Useful torque and a reasonable price make it a practical work vehicle.
2 seatsVanGasoline4-star safety122 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssecondary usage match

Usage fit

Family 61 / 67
City 46 / 42
Budget / value 67 / 63
Road trip 47 / 50
Performance 24 / 22
Cargo 46 / 72
Practical 42 / 46
Premium 16 / 19
Winter 22 / 22

Scores out of 100. Blue = Volkswagen Caddy II · Orange = Ford Transit Connect Van

Specs side-by-side

Spec Volkswagen Caddy II Ford Transit Connect Van
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Volkswagen Caddy II

  • 750 L cargo space handles bulky loads.
  • Simple two-seat layout suits solo drivers or pairs.
  • 7.5 L/100 km combined—efficient for its class.
  • Around 12000, it represents good value in its segment.

Ford Transit Connect Van

  • 2500-liter cargo space handles bulky gear and daily deliveries
  • Efficient for its class at 8.5 L/100 km, with a strong consumption ranking
  • 300 Nm torque supports hauling and confident merging
  • Around 25,000 price offers good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Volkswagen Caddy II if…
Best fuel economy
Volkswagen Caddy II uses 7.5 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Transit Connect Van if…
More power
Ford Transit Connect Van puts out 122 hp vs 69 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons