Volkswagen Arteon
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Ford Taurus SHO
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Volkswagen Arteon
Car A
Volkswagen Arteon
The Volkswagen Arteon blends strong petrol performance with real everyday usability for growing families and road trips. Front‑wheel drive and 8.5 L/100 km combined consumption make it less ideal for harsh winters or efficiency‑first buyers.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8.5 L/100km
Ford Taurus SHO
Car B
Ford Taurus SHO
The Ford Taurus SHO blends a twin‑turbo V6 punch with five-seat practicality, making it a capable pick for road trips and growing families. Expect higher fuel use and FWD traction limits as trade-offs.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety365 hp
Why compared more powerbetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 65 / 62
City 36 / 30
Budget / value 59 / 53
Road trip 64 / 63
Performance 33 / 37
Cargo 31 / 28
Practical 44 / 37
Premium 34 / 35
Winter 30 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Volkswagen Arteon · Orange = Ford Taurus SHO

Specs side-by-side

Spec Volkswagen Arteon Ford Taurus SHO
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Volkswagen Arteon

  • Strong performance for its class: 280 hp and 0–100 km/h in 5.6 s
  • Spacious 5-seat layout and 563 L trunk suit families and road trips
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 36,000
  • Positive safety ranking signal for peace of mind

Ford Taurus SHO

  • 365 hp and 5.9 s 0–100 km/h enable confident highway passing
  • 500 L trunk and five seats support luggage and passengers on trips
  • Safety ranks as a noted strength in signals, aligning with family needs
  • About $35,000 represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Volkswagen Arteon if…
Best fuel economy
Volkswagen Arteon uses 8.5 L/100km vs 12.4 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Ford Taurus SHO if…
More power
Ford Taurus SHO puts out 365 hp vs 280 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons