BMW 220i Active Tourer vs Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

BMW 220i Active Tourer

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

BMW 220i Active Tourer

A city-focused 5-seat hatchback that blends efficient fuel use (5.6 L/100 km) with quick 0-100 km/h in 7.0 s and a usable 415 L trunk. Best if you want good value in its segment rather than maximum cargo room or winter-focused capability.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety154 hp

Car B

Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

A compact, city-focused petrol model that balances efficiency and everyday usability with decent pace. Strong reliability and safety signals make it an easy fit for commuters and small families, but it’s not aimed at cargo-heavy or premium tastes.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety5 L/100km

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 55 / 64

City 60 / 76

Budget / value 49 / 75

Road trip 42 / 29

Performance 29 / 29

Cargo 23 / 19

Practical 40 / 54

Premium 45 / 15

Winter 26 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = BMW 220i Active Tourer · Orange = Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Specs side-by-side

Spec BMW 220i Active Tourer Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons